<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Redefines Distilled Spirits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/california-redefines-distilled-spirits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/california-redefines-distilled-spirits/</link>
	<description>Jay R. Brooks on Beer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://beerzine.com/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Pete</title>
		<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/california-redefines-distilled-spirits/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>California Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brookstonbeerbulletin.com/california-redefines-distilled-spirits/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Controller Chiang just lost my vote.

The real hypocrisy here is that while now taxed at the higher rate of distilled spirits, these same alcopops can still be sold under a beer-and-wine license. Are they &quot;distilled spirits&quot; or not?

And just whom do we contact to get this Coca-Cola and Happy Meal tax in place? Or better yet, how about a high-fructose corn syrup tax? Now there&#039;s something that might actually promote public health.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controller Chiang just lost my vote.</p>
<p>The real hypocrisy here is that while now taxed at the higher rate of distilled spirits, these same alcopops can still be sold under a beer-and-wine license. Are they &#8220;distilled spirits&#8221; or not?</p>
<p>And just whom do we contact to get this Coca-Cola and Happy Meal tax in place? Or better yet, how about a high-fructose corn syrup tax? Now there&#8217;s something that might actually promote public health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Sellers</title>
		<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/california-redefines-distilled-spirits/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Sellers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brookstonbeerbulletin.com/california-redefines-distilled-spirits/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>J -

Thank you again for pointing these things out.  I had never heard this was an issue needing redefinition... and I just don&#039;t have any words.  I guess I don&#039;t have any connection whatsoever to this neo-prohibitionist movement and am often more than a little stunned to see it evidenced in subtle, yet compelling ways.

Do you know if this is something that can be taken up with our Senators, or House Members?  Or is this just an area that can be arbitrarily &#039;defined&#039; by those in the big seat?  Incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J -</p>
<p>Thank you again for pointing these things out.  I had never heard this was an issue needing redefinition&#8230; and I just don&#8217;t have any words.  I guess I don&#8217;t have any connection whatsoever to this neo-prohibitionist movement and am often more than a little stunned to see it evidenced in subtle, yet compelling ways.</p>
<p>Do you know if this is something that can be taken up with our Senators, or House Members?  Or is this just an area that can be arbitrarily &#8216;defined&#8217; by those in the big seat?  Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

