<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU Rules ABI Cannot Trademark Budweiser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/eu-rules-abi-cannot-trademark-budweiser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/eu-rules-abi-cannot-trademark-budweiser/</link>
	<description>Jay R. Brooks on Beer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://beerzine.com/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerman49</title>
		<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/eu-rules-abi-cannot-trademark-budweiser/comment-page-1/#comment-34416</link>
		<dc:creator>beerman49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brookston.beerzine.com/?p=6086#comment-34416</guid>
		<description>Would that US courts have the same cojones as their EU counterparts regarding trademarking &amp; infringement thereupon!  Mickey D&#039;s is the worst offender, having sic-ed their lawyers on innumerable Mc(anything) small businesses.

May the future see more of these megalomaniacal businesses having some sense slapped into them on such issues!  I wish that Yoko Ono had blasted Chase for desecrating John Lennon&#039;s memory when they used &quot;Instant Karma&quot; in the TV ad that ran incessantly after they bought out WaMu.  But she probably found the royalty payoff too big to resist :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that US courts have the same cojones as their EU counterparts regarding trademarking &amp; infringement thereupon!  Mickey D&#8217;s is the worst offender, having sic-ed their lawyers on innumerable Mc(anything) small businesses.</p>
<p>May the future see more of these megalomaniacal businesses having some sense slapped into them on such issues!  I wish that Yoko Ono had blasted Chase for desecrating John Lennon&#8217;s memory when they used &#8220;Instant Karma&#8221; in the TV ad that ran incessantly after they bought out WaMu.  But she probably found the royalty payoff too big to resist :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Chainey</title>
		<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/eu-rules-abi-cannot-trademark-budweiser/comment-page-1/#comment-34329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Chainey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brookston.beerzine.com/?p=6086#comment-34329</guid>
		<description>Having been to the fine Budweiser Budvar brewery in Czecho, and having sold their Czechvar labelled product in theUSA, I remain amused at AB&#039;s position of contesting the trademarks.

Only in situations where the consumer verbally orders by saying  just &quot;Budweiser&quot; - typically here in the US - does the potential for confusion arise.  And it will be assumed the American Version is the one being called for 99.99% of the time, because anyone wishing the Budvar version will automatically add that suffix, so as to not get the &quot;wrong&quot; beer.
  
Now that the AB network of distributors is handling both products  here, the opportunity to grow both is being squandered by In-Bev.  

There of course is the 3rd Budweiser, Budweiser Burgerbrau, but then again, a suffix solves the issue.

Budvar was known as &quot;The Beer of Kings&quot; before AB&#039;s version was &quot;The King of Beers.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been to the fine Budweiser Budvar brewery in Czecho, and having sold their Czechvar labelled product in theUSA, I remain amused at AB&#8217;s position of contesting the trademarks.</p>
<p>Only in situations where the consumer verbally orders by saying  just &#8220;Budweiser&#8221; &#8211; typically here in the US &#8211; does the potential for confusion arise.  And it will be assumed the American Version is the one being called for 99.99% of the time, because anyone wishing the Budvar version will automatically add that suffix, so as to not get the &#8220;wrong&#8221; beer.</p>
<p>Now that the AB network of distributors is handling both products  here, the opportunity to grow both is being squandered by In-Bev.  </p>
<p>There of course is the 3rd Budweiser, Budweiser Burgerbrau, but then again, a suffix solves the issue.</p>
<p>Budvar was known as &#8220;The Beer of Kings&#8221; before AB&#8217;s version was &#8220;The King of Beers.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/eu-rules-abi-cannot-trademark-budweiser/comment-page-1/#comment-34283</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brookston.beerzine.com/?p=6086#comment-34283</guid>
		<description>Good.  The product that they have to call &quot;Czechvar&quot; here is a far superior product.

If AB/InBev spent even a fraction of the amount they spend on lawyers and gimmicky advertising on actually making a good product, they&#039;d be far better off.  But I guess it&#039;s just easier to sic lawyers on other companies in an attempt to put them out of business.

Nice to see them lose this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good.  The product that they have to call &#8220;Czechvar&#8221; here is a far superior product.</p>
<p>If AB/InBev spent even a fraction of the amount they spend on lawyers and gimmicky advertising on actually making a good product, they&#8217;d be far better off.  But I guess it&#8217;s just easier to sic lawyers on other companies in an attempt to put them out of business.</p>
<p>Nice to see them lose this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

