Brookston Beer Bulletin

Jay R. Brooks on Beer

  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial
  • Birthdays
  • Art & Beer

Socialize

  • Dribbble
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Powered by Head Quarters Built on WordPress
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Born On Date Aborted

Born On Date Aborted

March 13, 2009 By Jay Brooks

Using a twisted phrase worthy of Yoda, A-B launched the “Born On Date” in September of 1996 and with it, their advertising began including the self-evident tagline “fresh beer tastes better.” They were nothing, if not fastidious, in enforcing it and their efficient distributor network pulled any product that was older than 110 days.

Over the last decade plus, A-B has used that policy as a way to criticize every other big brewer not doing likewise, which is pretty much everyone else. But early last month, Anheuser-Busch suddenly announced that they would be abandoning the cherished “born on date” for a number of brands, including Bud Ice along with Honey Lager, Pale Ale and Porter under the Michelob brand. Effectively it’s all the “new and niche beers” that will stay on the shelves longer, at least 180 days. The born on date will continue to be used on the flagship Budweiser and Bud Light, and also Bud Select, Busch and Natty Light.

As most people knew, the product at that age was most likely still drinkable, and as a result who knows how much money was lost. Well, the new overlords at A-B InBev are not A-B, and they’re loathe to throw money away if they can possibly help it, any money, no matter what. Frugal is the kind word for their penchant for implementing cost-cutting measures, so it comes as no surprise that they would discontinue what was obviously a wasteful, albeit P.R. savvy, program. But to save face and try to convince the public that the change is good, despite what they’ve been saying for over ten years about anyone not doing what they did, the spin machine has been turned up to overdrive.

They’re claiming that the 110-day limit is no longer necessary because “A-B has improved its brewing processes and packaging — using new fillers and bottle crowns — that reduce the amount of oxygen in its beers.” If you believe that, I’ve got some swamp land in Florida I’d like to show you.

In the statement A-B released, supply veep Peter Kraemer said the following. “In recent years our brewery team has made significant improvements in both the brewing and packaging processes that have resulted in our beers leaving the brewery at the peak of freshness, and then maintaining that freshness much longer than in the past.”

So, assuming that’s true — a doubtful assumption at best — then why aren’t they abandoning the “born on date” for all their products? Can it be possible that after inventing these so-called new and improved “processes and packaging” that they decided not to use them on their best-selling products? You tell me, does that make any sense? Or is it more likely that’s the spin to avoid making it seem like they’re going back on the self-aggrandizing commitment that they’ve been using over ten years to proselytize brand loyalty and make their products seem fresher than their competitors, which of course isn’t remotely true.

We’re certainly seeing some remarkable changes since the new rulers arrived in St. Louis; layoffs, new policies to pay suppliers more slowly and abandoning the “born on date” for several of their brands. These are all measures taken to cut costs, save money and pay of the debt incurred from buying A-B. Undoubtedly, there will be more of these. What’s next? Only time will tell.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized



Comments

  1. Brian H says

    March 13, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    I have been wondering about how a born on date would look on Stella Artois and other InBev products. Either fresh is better and imports are old and nasty, or, or, well, it just isn’t relevant anymore, is it?

  2. Keith Brainard says

    March 14, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    I have to say that I like born on dating. Not that I find it totally relevant to the A-B line of products.

    However, Dogfish Head uses it, and I find it a lot more informative than a “best by” date. For a lot of the less common beers, shelf life can be a real issue. When you get a little place with a thousand beers in stock, some are destined to sit around longer than others. Without a “bottled on” date, you’re left to guess how old the bottle is, or hope for tell-tale dust or known outdated packaging.

    With “bottled on” dating, you know exactly when it was packaged, and you can make your own decision on if it’s fresh enough for you. Sometimes, old bottling dates are even a boon. (Other times they just leave you up a Kriek!)

  3. michael Reinhardt says

    March 15, 2009 at 6:18 am

    Born on date? It never existed as a beer to begin with.

Find Something

Northern California Breweries

Please consider purchasing my latest book, California Breweries North, available from Amazon, or ask for it at your local bookstore.

Beer Bulletin Email

Enter your email address to receive daily digests:

Recent Comments

  • Martyn Cornell on Historic Beer Birthday: Anton Dreher Jr.
  • Martyn Cornell on Historic Beer Birthday: Anton Dreher Jr.
  • Martyn Cornell on Historic Beer Birthday: Anton Dreher Jr.
  • Lucy Corne on Beer Birthday: Lucy Corne-Duthie
  • Kendall Staggs on Beer In Ads #4341: Miss Rheingold 1955 Filling Yuletide Requests

Recent Posts

  • Beer In Ads #4394: Brooklyn Girl Is Named Miss Rheingold 1957 March 28, 2023
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Jaromír Vejvoda March 28, 2023
  • Historic Beer Birthday: August Anheuser Busch, Jr. a.k.a. Gussie Busch March 28, 2023
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Frederick Pabst March 28, 2023
  • Beer In Ads #4393: New Miss Rheingold 1957, Margie McNally March 27, 2023

Tag Cloud

Advertising Anheuser-Busch Announcements Bay Area Belgium Brewers Association Brewing Equipment Budweiser Business California Christmas Europe France Germany Guinness Health & Beer History Holidays Hops Humor Infographics Kegs Law Mainstream Coverage Miller Brewing Northern California Pabst Packaging Patent Pennsylvania Press Release Prohibitionists Rheingold San Francisco Schlitz Science Science of Brewing Sports Statistics The Netherlands UK Uncategorized United States Video Washington

The Sessions

session_logo_all_text_1500

Next Session: Dec. 7, 2018
#142: One More for the Road
Previous Sessions
  • #141: Future of Beer Blogging
  • #140: Pivo
  • #139: Beer & the Good Life
  • #138: The Good in Wood
  • #137: German Wheat
Archive, History & Hosting

Typology Tuesday

Typology-png
Next Typology:
On or Before March 29, 2016
#3: Irish-Style Dry Stout
Previous Typologies
  • #2: Bock Feb. 2016
  • #1: Barley Wine Jan. 2016
Archive & History

This month’s posts

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Feb    

BBB Archives

Go to mobile version