Brookston Beer Bulletin

Jay R. Brooks on Beer

  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial
  • Birthdays
  • Art & Beer

Socialize

  • Dribbble
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Powered by Head Quarters Built on WordPress
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Michael Jackson Tweets: A Joke?

Michael Jackson Tweets: A Joke?

April 20, 2009 By Jay Brooks

As retweeted by Rate Beer, one of three he’s following, along with Beer Advocate and the Lost Abbey, some prankster has set up a Twitter account under the name “mjbeer” with Michael’s photo as the avatar and “The REAL Michael Jackson Beer Twitter” in the Bio.

So far, only three tweets have been done, all within a little over an hour. The first is a review of the Lost Abbey’s Angel’s Share.

Drinking Lost Abbey 2008 Brandy Barrel Angels Share. This beer is cloyingly sweet and undercarbonated. It’s official I’m rolling in my grave.

In the second, he (or she) confesses it’s all a “little joke” and hopes they’re “not offending anyone.”

Waiting for ratebeer to reboot. It appears that they have found my little joke. I hope that I am not offending anyone. More reviews to come.

I’m pretty hard to offend and have a fairly broad sense of humor, but reading tweets purporting to be from an old friend and colleague who died tragically too soon less than two years ago is, I must say, more than a little offensive. Am I off the mark here? Am I being a stick in the mud? Does anyone find this funny? I’m pretty sure Michael’s estate won’t find someone impersonating him very funny. It just seems wildly inappropriate to me and in very bad taste.

 
UPDATE: I’m happy to report that the mjbeer Twitter account appears to have been deleted and removed.
 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized



Comments

  1. Tim Beauchamp says

    April 21, 2009 at 2:23 am

    Hi Jay;

    I can sympathize with your discomfort at the faux Michael Jackson Twitter account. I am sorry for the loss of your friend and I was also a big fan of Michael Jackson.

    I choose to not believe the account and commentary by the MJ stand-in is not done out of disrespect and actually probably more as a tribute.

    My impression of the original Michael J., was that he had a very well developed sense of humor and appreciation of irony. You, knowing the man, would know better but I would expect that he would approve, and probably chuckle about it over a good beer.

  2. beerinator says

    April 21, 2009 at 4:57 am

    Yeah, I think it’s pretty lame and isn’t funny at all.

  3. Lew Bryson says

    April 21, 2009 at 5:18 am

    I have someone who periodically posts comments from long-dead Pennsylvania brewers on my blog. That’s kind of funny. But this? I’ve got a pretty broad sense of humor myself, and this is not funny. ‘Offensive’ is polite, Jay.

  4. Julie@GoodBrewer says

    April 21, 2009 at 7:55 am

    I agree with you. It’s distasteful and in my opinion a little cruel.

  5. Mrs. J says

    April 21, 2009 at 10:17 am

    Totally f***ed up.

  6. michael Reinhardt says

    April 21, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    It is distasteful. If nothing else, it’s capitalizing on the name of a guy who made their beer world possible. Is this how they are generating traffic? I guess I should stop trying to do mine through content.

  7. Tom Dalldorf says

    April 21, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    J: MJ lugged a very heavy word processor around for years as the very thought of a computer sent him into fits of apoplexy. MJ Tweeting is not only offensive but technologically improbable.

  8. Derrick says

    April 21, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    Maybe twenty years from now, it might be in good fun if cleverly done, and as a homage to Micheal Jackson. It’s too soon after his death to be anything but in poor taste.

  9. Ben says

    April 23, 2009 at 6:06 am

    It is dumb and decidedly unfunny, but offensive, no. Being offended is a choice, one chooses to be offended. I think we spend altogether too much time these days being offended by things which we are better off ignoring. That is the treatment that this stuff deserves. All of the indignation simply fuels more.

  10. J says

    April 23, 2009 at 8:35 am

    Ben, I can’t agree that people “choose” to be offended, any more than someone chooses to be gay. Any reaction to something, if authentic, usually happens organically based on whatever is perceived. I know people can “fake” offense to further an agenda or for political motives, but I’m talking about real offense. “Offensive” is defined as “causing resentful displeasure; highly irritating, angering, or annoying.” That certainly fits my reaction. I was annoyed and a little angered and it did cause some displeasure at dredging up those emotions. Michael was a friend, someone I admired and looked up to, but also enjoyed having a pint with and discussing jazz or literature. I was very shaken by his untimely passing. I agree that there are an increasing number of incidents where offense may be unwarranted or used to an advantage, but for me personally this was not one of them.

  11. Brian Richards says

    April 23, 2009 at 8:44 am

    -Very distasteful indeed. I’m glad they decided to remove it. If you have to post: “I hope I’m not offending anyone”, than you probably are, and you probably know it.

  12. Ben says

    April 23, 2009 at 9:22 am

    Fair enough, you are different than I am and we disagree on this point. I can most certainly talk myself out of wasting time being annoyed or angry about something stupid and insignificant that takes place on the interweb. My initial reaction might be anger, but I control it from that point onward. Unless you think that some asshat can really sully the name of a great man with something so sophomoric, I think my advice to ignore idiots is sound. This kind of thing can take years off your life. People like this are just not worth it.

  13. Harry says

    April 24, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Jay, you’re not wrong, very offensive, and I’m almost impossible to offend.

Find Something

Northern California Breweries

Please consider purchasing my latest book, California Breweries North, available from Amazon, or ask for it at your local bookstore.

Beer Bulletin Email

Enter your email address to receive daily digests:

Recent Comments

  • Martyn Cornell on Historic Beer Birthday: Anton Dreher Jr.
  • Martyn Cornell on Historic Beer Birthday: Anton Dreher Jr.
  • Martyn Cornell on Historic Beer Birthday: Anton Dreher Jr.
  • Lucy Corne on Beer Birthday: Lucy Corne-Duthie
  • Kendall Staggs on Beer In Ads #4341: Miss Rheingold 1955 Filling Yuletide Requests

Recent Posts

  • Beer Birthday: Jim Crooks March 24, 2023
  • Beer In Ads #4389: Miss Rheingold 1957 Finalists In The News March 23, 2023
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Michael Brand March 23, 2023
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Maximilian Schaefer March 23, 2023
  • Beer In Ads #4388: Miss Rheingold 1957 Finalists In A Circle March 22, 2023

Tag Cloud

Advertising Anheuser-Busch Announcements Bay Area Belgium Brewers Association Brewing Equipment Budweiser Business California Christmas Europe France Germany Guinness Health & Beer History Holidays Hops Humor Infographics Kegs Law Mainstream Coverage Miller Brewing Northern California Pabst Packaging Patent Pennsylvania Press Release Prohibitionists Rheingold San Francisco Schlitz Science Science of Brewing Sports Statistics The Netherlands UK Uncategorized United States Video Washington

The Sessions

session_logo_all_text_1500

Next Session: Dec. 7, 2018
#142: One More for the Road
Previous Sessions
  • #141: Future of Beer Blogging
  • #140: Pivo
  • #139: Beer & the Good Life
  • #138: The Good in Wood
  • #137: German Wheat
Archive, History & Hosting

Typology Tuesday

Typology-png
Next Typology:
On or Before March 29, 2016
#3: Irish-Style Dry Stout
Previous Typologies
  • #2: Bock Feb. 2016
  • #1: Barley Wine Jan. 2016
Archive & History

This month’s posts

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Feb    

BBB Archives

Go to mobile version