I suspect this rant will win me few friends and probably more than a few enemies, but sometimes you have to say what’s on your mind. I’ve only seen a little about this story — Parents locked up for son’s boozy 16th — all of it curiously from the press outside of the country, so I can only comment on what facts I do know. It seems a Virginia couple had a 16th birthday party for their son back in August of 2002 and served some beer to him and a few of his friends. Yesterday, after the Supreme Court refused to hear their appeal in late May, both went off to jail to serve 4 1/2-year sentences, six-months for each kid at the party with measurable levels of alcohol.
At the party there were around 30 people between 12 and 18 years old. Of those 30, nine apparently had “measurable levels” of alcohol in their system. The fact that they used the careful phrase “measurable levels” infers that they were well below the already questionable 0.08% which arbitrarily defines what it means to be drunk. To me it sounds like they gave the kids a taste of beer in a controlled setting. As reported in the Brisbane Times, the couple was “[c]oncerned that the teenagers would drink without supervision, [so] the parents said they had bought alcohol with the understanding that the teens would spend the night at their place and collected half a dozen car keys to prevent drunk driving.” Under a less Draconian society than ours, that doesn’t strike me as particularly unreasonable. But we live in a society that generally does not allow parents to use their own judgment about how to raise their children. Now I want to be crystal clear that I don’t think for one second that they should have given beer to the other kids, not under today’s climate especially. While I can almost understand why some of those parents might be upset, had my son been there I would not have been troubled in the least. As for their own son, well that’s another matter. The fact that learning to drink responsibly in the home, the way it’s done throughout most of the rest of the world, is illegal here says quite a lot about our society and its commitment to raising mature, self-reliant adults.
The fact that Paris Hilton got a mere 45 days for repeatedly flaunting the law and this couple got 4 1/2 years for showing poor judgment once, even though they were at least trying to keep people safe and off the roads, is also illustrative of how out of whack our justice system has become. The idea that they deserved jail time seems ludicrous to me. But then I don’t see alcohol as the great social ill that so many people do. I have a hard time thinking of them as criminals, and for very personal reasons. When I was a kid not that long ago, my mother and stepfather acted in much the same way, as did other parents of my peers. My mother, for all her flaws, was a nurse and one of the most caring people I knew. While in nursing school she spent one of her rotations in the ER and saw more than her fair share of drug overdoses. When I started high school and began going to parties, she despaired that I would take up drugs. So she offered me a deal. If I agreed to never do drugs she would keep the basement refrigerator stocked with beer for me and my friends. Needless to say, I took the deal and spent many happy and safe nights with friends drinking responsibly in my basement. We had a pool table, television, sofas and privacy. That my mother would be a considered a criminal today — and indeed technically was then too, I suppose — strikes me as absurd. She was correct in assuming that I would drink and that there was nothing whatsoever she could do about it short of locking me under the stairs. It wasn’t just me, it was just the times, at least to some extent. Almost everyone I knew drank at least on the weekends. Some of my friends’ parents even knew that their kids were drinking at my house with my parent’s consent and knowledge. They felt better knowing where their kids were and that they were safe with people they knew rather than out driving around and/or out with strangers. These people were all criminals? They were bad parents?
In our post-MADD society that’s certainly how they would be viewed today. But I don’t accept that they loved their children any less than parents today simply because they chose their own way to deal with underage drinking. I recall one of our graduation parties — this was 1977 — that one of my fellow seniors threw. Her parents, along several others parents of seniors, were there and they provided several kegs, which were in the backyard. In the basement there was a true home theater (the father was a projectionist by trade) and he was showing Mel Brooks’ Young Frankenstein on film. Of the 435 people in my graduating class, it seemed like most of them were there that night. If this scene unfolded today the parents would be hauled off to the hoosegow, as the case with the Virginia couple. Yet it was safe and incident free, like virtually all the parent-chaperoned parties I attended. But one of the consequences of strictly interpreting law in such a way that the letter of it becomes more important than its spirit is that it criminalizes parents for making choices that fall outside the agenda set by neo-prohibitionists and other conservative interests that want to control every aspect of society with their own set of moral values.
When my kids reach their teen years, I would love to be able to teach them about responsible drinking firsthand. But given that doing so might give the state the so-called authority to take them away from me, I won’t risk it. I find it deeply troubling that I can’t decide for myself how to raise them or teach them how to be an adult. The notion that our government can do a better job from afar is preposterous. The best I can hope for is that they’ll see my wife and me drinking responsibly in our home; with meals, on sunny afternoons on the back deck, and so on. Hopefully they’ll also see my many friends in the brewing industry likewise drinking responsibly at the few remaining beer festivals that still allow children. Maybe seeing that will allow them to model responsible behavior and ignore the ridiculous propaganda spewed out by the neo-prohibitionist groups. It would be far better if I could slowly taste them on alcohol so they know what it is, how to choose it and how to enjoy it responsibly. We give 16-year olds learner’s permits so they can learn how to drive with an experienced adult. People should be able to do the same thing with alcohol without fear of being arrested or worse.
Instead, my kids will undoubtedly get most of their information from the media and their peers — despite my best efforts — and most of it will be wrong. Many kids today raised under such conditions understandably become binge drinkers. Anyone with an ounce of sense sees the connection between a lack of education and irresponsible drinking by teens and young adults. Future politicians, hoping to distance themselves from the results of their own lack of education, will call this time in their lives a “youthful indiscretion.” They will likewise fail to see that such an environment was been created by the very people and laws that set out to stop underage drinking. All they’ve succeeded in doing is to make the problem far worse. The Virginia couple heading off to jail has had their lives ruined by a system that made them criminals for trying to do the right thing. Is it really so unreasonable to believe that their son would have wanted to celebrate his 16th birthday with alcohol? I did. Most of the people I know did. It’s only wrong because we — or I should say you and you and you — have decided it’s wrong. It hasn’t been wrong through much of humanity’s history. It isn’t considered wrong right now in many parts of the world. I have no trouble believing this couple reasonably thought they were keeping their son and his friends safe that night. And they very well may have. But that obviously counted for naught. The couple is divorced now. Their son will be turning 21 later this year, in August. His parents’ lives have been ruined. I’d love to know the effect all of this has had on him and his friends who had a nip of beer five years ago. Have they all become alcoholics? Hopeless hooligans and ruffians? N’er do wells destined to be a burden on society for the balance of their lives? Doubtful. It’s more likely they’re normal college-age kids no different from everyone else around them. Apart from the attention this case probably got locally, I doubt it’s had any effect on their lives whatsoever. So in the end two parents who were trying to do the right thing and likely caused no real harm whatsoever ran afoul of neo-prohibitionist agendas and the laws they’ve spawned, and in the process had their lives destroyed. If that’s justice, maybe it’s time she took off the blindfold.
Rick says
Wow. That is well said, articulate and a reflection of much of what I experienced as a child and what I believe today regarding underage drinking. My mom was a nurse too and had, what sounds like, the same rules your mother had. I can honestly say I never drove drunk in high school, and when my friends came over to my house for a party, they didn’t either. And you’re right – if my mom had ‘laid the law down’ with me, I would have found a way to drink, most likely in an irresponsible manner. Thanks for sharing – Rick
Bob Tobin says
BINGO! I couldn’t agree with you more. Parents teaching responsibility. This seems to be a foreign idea today. This is a very similar situation to when I grew up (I graduated HS in ’76). We seem to have this desire today to legislate everything so we don’t have to take responsibility for anything that happens. I hate to think that I could be charged with a crime for teaching my kids responsibility.
Jess Sand says
Sad, but not surprising (particularly for Virginia). Another brilliant write-up and analysis, Jay. Thanks for sharing what might not be the most popular opinion; I couldn’t agree with you more and it strikes me as terribly sad that a family was destroyed because of a couple had some common sense.
Why is this country so afraid of nuance and intelligent thought?
Hair says
I agree that parents should be allowed to give their kids alcohol if they see fit. No parent should go to jail for giving their kid a taste of beer. But these parents gave *other* kids alcohol. They gave beer to kids that were not their own. Giving alcohol to a minor is against the law. I do not really see the problem here. Yeah, Paris Hilton should go to jail for a very long time, but that does not mean these parents should not go to jail. 4 years seems harsh to me. If that is the max they should definitly be given the min, but the law is the law.
You think you should be allowed to raise your child, not the government, right? Well how would you feel if another parent gave your kid something you did not want them to have? What gave these parents the right to raise other parent’s kids without permission?
And believe me, I am very pro-beer anti-controlling-government. But other parents should not be allowed to give my kids a substance that, for their age, is illegal. *I* do not care if another parent gives my kids beer, but some parents might. They have that right. And I would care if another parent gave my kids cigerettes.
J says
Hair, you’re right that giving the other kids beer was a stupid thing to do in today’s society. There’s no doubt that it was a poor decision, to say the least. I tried to be “crystal clear” in saying so, and even used those exact words. We don’t know how each of the other kids’ parents felt. It’s the state that prosecutes criminal cases, even if the parents didn’t want them to. I think punishments generally should fit the crime, the amount of harm or even potential harm should have something to do with the sentencing process and that just doesn’t seem to be the case here. That’s the only reason I used the Hilton analogy, because the two seem disproportionally reciprocal, by which I mean Hilton should have gotten more time and these parents less. How much, and/or should they have received jail sentences at all, seems an open question. There may have been minimum sentencing guidelines attached to the statute they were charged under, but I don’t know what those were, of course, because it wasn’t reported.
If a friend of my child’s parent gave my son something I didn’t want them to have — it would depend what, of course — I would still most likely not try to have them jailed over it but would instead try to resolve it as amicably as I could. But apart from poison or something that could permanently damage them (like, as you suggest, cigarettes), what would I not want them to have? I hope I will act as my parents did in such situations, which is that they got to know the parents of the friends I was spending the most time with so they felt comfortable with where I was spending my time.
To me, saying “the law is the law” is a bit of a copout. The law is what we as a society decides it should be. Strict liability, federal minimum sentencing guidelines and three strikes laws have all be shown to have major problems that lead to grave injustices. There are hundreds, maybe thousands, of laws on the books right now that are reprehensible or absurd which we rightly ignore and which the authorities no longer prosecute. But they’re still technically the law. I think looking at the law in a rigid black and white view is as bad for a society as having no laws at all. But then I think compassion is one of the things that makes us human, and not everyone agrees with that. C’est la vie.
Loren says
Great writeup Jay. But this exposure regarding underage education about drinking should be taken more into the mainstream, don’t you think? Maybe pen an article about this subject for an upcoming BeerAdvocate.com magazine issue? I don’t subscribe to Celebrator or All About Beer so excuse me if this subject has been covered before in writing. Even still…it should be repeated over and over and over…
Cheers!
Clarke says
Well done, J. What’s happening to this country? When I was a Senior in high school, I got up the nerve to ask my Mom to buy my friends and I a six-pack of beer. One six pack. She did it, with the understanding that we were to drink it at our house, and my friends had to spend the night. She brought back a six-pack of 1812 Malt Liquor. One can each got us lit up, and the rest sat in the fridge for a month or two.
My Mom was a hero that night, and no one got hurt. I’ve always appreciated that she did that for me, and it didn’t make her a bad parent. If anything, it strengthened our relationship. She knew she could trust me, and I felt that she knew how responsible I was.
If they wanted to slap this woman on the wrist, that’s fine. But to make her do hard time – that’s just insane. What about her kids? What’s life for them going to be like without their mother for 2 years? And imagine the guilt they’re feeling over all of this.
Hair of the Dog Dave says
“it criminalizes parents for making choices that fall outside the agenda set by neo-prohibitionists and other conservative interests that want to control every aspect of society with their own set of moral values.”
Jay, you are 100% on the money. I read this story in the news and it made me sick. The son is dropping out of school and got a job at UPS so he can have a new home for his mom when she gets out of jail. He even asked the judge to throw him in jail instead of his mom.
Besides, when kids go away to college, it is always the repressed ones whose parents never let them drink that get fall-down drunk all the time. Parents need to teach their kids how to drink responsibly, and not take this prohibitionist, not-a-single-drop-of-liquor stance.
On a lighter note, I like the idea for a learner’s permit.