Brookston Beer Bulletin

Jay R. Brooks on Beer

  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial
  • Birthdays
  • Art & Beer

Socialize

  • Dribbble
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Powered by Genesis

B Is For Beer

January 5, 2009 By Jay Brooks

If you have kids and are in the beer business, there’s precious few things you can buy for them with beer logos or graphics on them. Which is shame, I say. When Porter was born, Anchor Brewery presented him with a cool onesie. A year or so later, a friend at Deschutes gave him a logo shirt just his size.

I don’t understand why people are so squeamish about this nowadays. When we were kids and iron-ons were all the rage, especially down the shore at Wildwood, Ocean City or any of the other New Jersey resort towns we’d drive to for a weekend getaway in high school. Tourist shops were littered with countless iron-ons, many of them beer themed and they had no qualms selling them to us. And why should they? You can’t drink a shirt. There’s no law so far as I know that prohibits minors from wearing the image of a product that they aren’t allowed to buy. It’s the same bullshit thing with websites claiming that you must be 21 to read their brewery website. Why? Since when is reading about anything restricted?

One of my favorite painters — Rene Magritte — famously reminded us of this in his iconic The Treachery of Images, though you probably know it by the translation of its text, “Ceci n’est pas une pipe,” which is “This is Not a Pipe.” The painting, you’ll recall, is simply a tobacco pipe on a blank canvas with the text beneath it. And the point Magritte was making is that images are not the objects, just representations. And so it is with brewery logos and words on a page (or computer screen). They’re not the beer themselves, which is prohibited for kids, but merely images. They have no intrinsic power, only what we assign to them.

But our society is so in thrall to the screeching minorities that believe they know best how you should raise your children that almost no company can offer such products for fear of these groups’ reaction, effectively curtailing what would otherwise be legal products that harm no one, unless you count the delicate sensibilities of the neo-prohibitionists (okay, I’m tired of writing that word and so will start using Lew Bryson’s preferred term, the New Drys, just to break it up). Heaven forfend that children see beer, beer brand logos or worst of all, beer on clothing. They might become familiar with them and/or not afraid of them, and we can’t have that. Because of this, I personally love finding shirts for my kids that will drive the New Drys nuts.

So I was mightily bummed yesterday when I came across this shirt, “B is For Beer,” because it’s only available is size up to 36 months, well past my urchins. I first stumbled on it from a UK website, but happily there is an American retailer carrying it, Baby Dagny.

It’s available in white, light blue and hop green. If my kids were younger, I’d buy two.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized

My Report Card From 2008

December 31, 2008 By Jay Brooks

Last year at this time, I made my usual five predictions for the 2008 beer year. Let’s see how I did.

 
The hops and malt shortages will continue to plague the industry throughout 2008 and may even grow worse.

My Score: A
This one wasn’t too much of a stretch, of course, though things did begin to calm down somewhat with the 2008 harvest.

 
Beer prices will go up, that’s a fact not a prediction. The real question is whether or not beer consumers will be willing to pay more and, if so, how much more?

My Score: A
Initial sales figures do seem to bear out that consumers are willing to pay a little bit more for craft beer. The growth figures by dollars remained in double digits, though with higher prices, it would have more surprising if they hadn’t. Volume growth did slow a little bit to 6.5% but was still better than the mainstream macro brands.

 
Distributor consolidation will increase and will continue to make things difficult for small brewers trying to bring their beer to market or increase their distribution to new areas.

My Score: A+
This was pretty much the number one topic at the NBWA Convention with Miller and Coors in arbitration and major import companies trying to figure out where they’d land. With InBev looking to make deep cuts to pay for acquiring Anheuser-Busch, there will likely be more distributors for sale and other shake-ups still to come in 2009.

 
Mergers among big multi-national beer companies will continue and at least one or two big such announcements will be made in 2008.

My Score: A+
I’d say this hunch came through with flying colors.

 
Neo-Prohibitionists will continue to step up attacks on alcohol generally and to specifically and inexplicably target beer.

My Score: A
This one was probably a little too predictable, but I was still surprised by how aggressive these chuckleheads became in 2008, attacking Santa Claus, alcopops and trying to get beer saddled with new and higher excise taxes.

 

Overall Score: A
I did better this year than last, though in retrospect I think I didn’t exactly go out on a limb with any of my prediction, taking a pretty safe route. At least it feels that way in retrospect. I think I’ll have to try harder this year to make less predictable predictions. See you next year!

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized

Beer Goggles In The Funny Pages

December 31, 2008 By Jay Brooks

A friend sent me this comic strip from Argyle Sweater by Scott Hilburn. It exploits the concept of beer goggles for comedic effect. The strip ran four days ago on 12.27.

 
There’s a line in another comic strip, a favorite of mine — Bizarro by Dan Piraro — that this comic made me immediately think of. It goes something like this. There are three people, each espousing their philosophy relating to glass that’s half liquid, half air. “As a pessimist, I say ‘the glass is half-empty,’ as a optimist, I say ‘the glass is half-full,” as an optometrist, ‘I say what the heck difference does it make?'”

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized

Top 10 Beer Stories of 2008

December 31, 2008 By Jay Brooks

As the year winds down yet again — wow, I’m feeling a weird sense of Deja Vu. Didn’t I just say that last year? — everybody and his brother has a top ten list for the year and I’m still no different. It helps, I think, to stop and reflect on what happened over the previous year which puts the whole year in perspective and makes it easier to prepare for the coming one. So here are my choices for the top ten beer stories of 2008.
 

Retro Beers’ Return: While this has been going on before, two high-profile old beers returned this year, both courtesy of Pabst trying to recreate the success they’ve had with Pabst Blue Ribbon. In January, they revived Hawaii’s iconic Primo. Later they resurrected bottled Schlitz in the Chicago area, with plans to roll it out wider. As one of the biggest beer brands in American brewing history, this one seemed like a no-brainer, but I haven’t heard of it taking on the kind of mystique that PBR has achieved. Also, a brewery in my Pennsylvania hometown brought back Reading Premium, which I confess did fill me with nostalgia.

Beer On Television: There were an unprecedented number of shows either airing on television or in development this year. From Dirty Jobs going to Yakima, Washington to pick hops to How Stuff Works breezily covering beer, at least TV started to pay attention to its huge audience of beer drinkers. I personally was involved with the shooting of two shows this year, one for Sacramento PBS and the other for Reason TV, plus consulted in varying degrees on at least three other television projects in development. That suggests to me that there are many more also being developed, too. And one that was shot last year, I understand is still shopping for a buyer.

Saranac Brewery Fire: Brewery fires in the 19th century were a fact of life, the sort of thing that was more “when” than “if.” They happened with alarming frequency but became relegated to the history books by modern architecture, new building codes and materials that were less flammable. When New York’s F.X. Matt Brewery in Utica caught fire due to a welding incident, it was a potent reminder how fragile these old structures really still are.

Philly Beer Week: My friends at Philly Beer Week showed us all how it could be done, when they impressively launched their series of events in March. There are now countless more “beer weeks” taking place or being planned across the country, at least in Indiana, Ohio, New York, Oregon, Syracuse, and San Francisco, not to mention the all-encompassing American Craft Ber Week. And Chicago and Colorado are rumored to be developing their own celebratory beer weeks. With 52 weeks in a year, there’s still plenty of room for more beer weeks. While some of these pre-dated Philly’s efforts, what the City of Brotherly Love did was take it to a new level, get unprecedented media attention and support and impress the hell out of anyone who witnessed it.

Budweiser American Ale: After years of double-digit growth by craft brewers and a slowing growth rate for the macro lagers, Anheuser-Busch launched its biggest assault to date, a nationwide rollout of an ale under the Budweiser brand name. Having tried it several times, it’s an inoffensive beer with only slightly more flavor than regular Budweiser, not something I’d choose to drink. But with A-B’s marketing muscle and ability to get their products distributed and place on store shelves, this one has the potential to steal sales from actual craft beer. I say actual, because the most insidious facet of the American Ale’s marketing barrage, along with Michelob, is the tagline “Crafting A Better Beer,” which to me seems like their trying to steal the perception of these beers being made by actual craft brewers. If you use the typical meaning of “craft” as something made by hand or involving small and artistic manufacture, then it’s hard to see how beers made in vats the size of Montana could ever be considered being “crafted.”

Neo-Prohibitionists Tactics Turn More Aggressive: I’ve long thought Neo-Prohibitionists to be capable of all manner of unsavory tactics with the goal more important than the means used to realize it. This year I think they really showed that “by any means necessary” approach to be true as they bullied their way into attacking alcopops, University Deans, state legislatures and even Santa Claus. In at least thirty states, they’re trying hard to raise the excise tax on beer. They’re unrelenting, well-funded and out of their gourds; a lethal combination. Now they’re showing themselves to be aggressive bullies and thugs, too.

The 75th Anniversary of Prohibition’s Repeal: With the Neo-Prohibitionists at the gate, the 75th Anniversary of the repeal of Prohibition was an important opportunity to celebrate what we’re all fighting to keep from happening again. The mainstream media ran countless stories about Prohibition’s repeal and there were many Op-Ed pieces about it, too. All year long, the beer industry used it to remind everybody that responsible beer drinking is a cherished part of society and to prohibit it completely would be as much of a mistake today as it was almost a century ago.

Beer in Politics: With a high profile Presidential election, every candidate tried to be the one ordinary citizens would want to sit down and have a beer with. There were numerous photo ops of candidates doing just that in neighborhood bars all over the country. Several craft brewers took it a step farther, creating special beers for the election. But with John McCain’s wife owning an A-B distributorship — indeed, most of their wealth came from this source — beer in politics became the subject of much speculation and scrutiny.

Merger Mania: It’s the way of big business, and this year it his the beer industry hard. One of last year’s biggest stories, the merger of Miller Brewing and Coors was approved by the Federal government on June 5 and the U.S. was down to two giant beer companies. In late January, a consortium of Carlsberg and Heineken bid on Scottish & Newcastle (itself the product of an earlier merger) and in March it was approved by shareholders. At the end of April, Magic Hat and Pyramid Breweries also merged.

InBev Buys Anheuser-Busch: One merger outstripped all of the others combined and there’s little doubt this was the story of the year. Rumored as early as February (and really for a year or more before that), InBev made their first bid June 11, and the media attention took off and has hardly stopped yet. We heard from very part of society on this one, from opportunist politicians to blue collar jingoists and even editorial cartoonists. Everyone had an opinion about this one, and, surprisingly, many thought it wouldn’t effect them at all, but this story will continue to have a ripple effect through every aspect of the beer industry for years to come. It’s over, yet it’s not over. Just before Christmas, the new A-B InBev started laying off employees in St. Louis. Distributor shakeups are still ongoing. We’ll be hearing about this one for some time to come.

And what will next year bring? See tomorrow’s post with my predictions for the beer industry in 2009.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized

Former BJCP Treasurer Sentenced

December 29, 2008 By Jay Brooks

If you’ve spent anytime around BJCP judges or hardcore homebrewing types, you’ve probably heard the conversation inevitably turn to the name Bill Slack. Slack used to be the treasurer of the judge-certifying organization, but was shown the door after it was discovered that he’d helped himself to at least $31,000 of the group’s money (and more likely closer to $64,000). The case has been winding through the courts for some time now, and just before Christmas, the BJCP got an early present, as Slack was finally sentenced, essentially ending the proceedings.

Slack plead guilty in September. He could have received as much as 20 years in prison, though federal guidelines suggested 10-26 months. Instead, Slack received a more rare “intermittent” sentence in which he’ll spend one week each month for a year behind bars. Following that he’ll be on probation for five years, and will have to pay the BJCP back $43,139 in restitution.

I never met the Nashua, New Hampshire man, but according to the story in the Nashua Telegraph, he sounds like he may have been something of a nut job. In 1998, he was arrested on an unrelated charge, when he “point[ed] a shotgun at a teenage Telegraph carrier who was trying to collect money for his delivery route.” You’ve got to watch out for those newspaper delivery boys or they’ll rob you blind. And stealing is better left to the professionals.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized

Dave Barry on Beer At Christmas

December 25, 2008 By Jay Brooks

While searching for Christmas quotations, I happened upon this gem by Dave Barry. Although it wasn’t quite right for my Christmas post, I thought it was still funny enough to share.

In the old days, it was not called the Holiday Season; the Christians called it “Christmas” and went to church; the Jews called it “Hanukkah” and went to synagogue; the atheists went to parties and drank. People passing each other on the street would say “Merry Christmas!” or “Happy Hanukkah!” or (to the atheists) “Look out for the wall!”

            — Dave Barry, “Christmas Shopping: A Survivor’s Guide”

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Holidays

Amber, Gold & Black

December 24, 2008 By Jay Brooks

Over at Real Beer’s Holiday Blog again, I posted a last minute gift idea that I thought I’d pimp here too, because I’m so impressed with it. British beer writer and historian Martyn Cornell published an e-book entitled Amber, Gold & Black: The Story of Britain’s Great Beers. It’s only available as a pdf so you can buy it online right now at the Corner Pub and have it in plenty of time for Christmas.

 

And not only is it easy to buy online, but it’s one of best books on beer styles ever written, the result of years of painstaking research that shatters many of the myths surrounding the origins of famous beer styles like Porters and India Pale Ales.

Chapters cover sixteen different beer styles and go into great detail about each one of them. Did I mention it’s also a pleasure to read? And it’s filled with photographs, graphics, beer labels and old brewery advertisements. No matter how much you think you know about beer, you’ll learn a great deal from Cornell’s efforts. And did I mention it’s a mere fiver? At just five pounds, it may well be the bargain of the year, too. Seriously, you should buy this book. One for yourself and at least one as a gift. It’s that good.

Here’s more information from the publisher:

Amber, Gold and Black, The Story of Britain’s Great Beers, by the award-winning beer writer Martyn Cornell, is the most comprehensive history of British beer styles of all kinds ever written, the true stories behind Porter, Bitter, Mild, Stout, IPA, Brown Ale, Burton Ale, Old Ale, Barley Wine, and all the other beers produced in Britain.

This ebook is a celebration of the depths of British beer, a look at the roots of the styles we enjoy today, as well as those ales and beers we have lost, and a study into how the liquids that fill our beer glasses, amber gold and black, developed over the years.

Astonishingly, this is the first book devoted solely to looking at the unique history of the different styles of beer produced in Britain.

If you read about beer online a lot, you may already know Cornell’s work, though perhaps not his name. Martyn Cornell also writes online as The Zythophile, easily one of the most informative and interesting beer blogs on the planet.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Uncategorized

Joe Sixpack’s 50 World’s Best Christmas Beers

December 23, 2008 By Jay Brooks

Yesterday, over at Real Beer’s Holiday Blog, with Don Russell’s permission I posted his choices for the World’s 50 Best Christmas Beers, taken from his new book, Christmas Beer. It’s a fun list, with some fine beers on it. Just over half the beers on the list are from abroad. Most I agree with; only a couple I would not have put on the list and there are only a few I think are missing. I figured he wouldn’t mind if I posted them here as well. What do you think of the list? What would you have done differently in compiling such a list?

 

World’s 50 Best Christmas Beers, as Selected by Don Russell a.k.a. Joe Sixpack

  1. Mad Elf Ale; Troegs Brewing, Pennsylvania
  2. Avec les Bons Voeux; La Brasserie Dupont, Belgium
  3. Samichlaus Bier; Schloss Eggenberg, Austria
  4. Stille Nacht; Brouwerij De Dolle Brouwers, Belgium
  5. Our Special Ale; Anchor Brewing, California
  6. Celebration Ale; Sierra Nevada Brewing, California
  7. Samuel Smith’s Winter Welcome Ale; The Old Brewery at Tadcaster, England
  8. Winter Solstice; Anderson Valley Brewing, California
  9. Old Jubilation; Avery Brewing, Colorado
  10. Ringnes Julebokk; Ringnes Bryggeri, Norway
  11. Delirium Noel; Brouwerij Huyghe, Belgium
  12. Baladin Noel; Birrificio Le Baladin, Italy
  13. Gouden Carolus Noel; Brouwerij Het Anker, Belgium
  14. La Binchoise Reserve Speciale; Brasserie La Binchoise, Belgium
  15. Corsendonk Christmas Ale; Brouwerij Corsedonk, Belgium
  16. Mahr’s Christmas Bock; Brauerei Mahr, Germany
  17. Affligem Noel; Brouwerij Affligem, Belgium
  18. Hibernation Ale; Great Divide Brewing, Colorado
  19. Santa’s Private Reserve Ale; Rogue Ales Brewery, Oregon
  20. Smuttynose Winter Ale; Smuttynose Brewing, New Hampshire
  21. Alpha Klaus; Three Floyds Brewing, Indiana
  22. Winter-Traum; Klosterbrauerei Weltenburg, Germany
  23. Scaldis Noel; Brasserie Dubuisson Freres, Belgium
  24. Winter White Ale; Bell’s Brewery, Michigan
  25. 2° Below Ale; New Belgium Brewing, Colorado
  26. La Dragonne; BFM Brasserie des Franches-Montagnes, Switzerland
  27. Ebenezer Ale; BridgePort Brewing, Oregon
  28. La Choulette de Noel; Brasserie la Choulette, France
  29. St. Nikolaus Bock Bier; Pennsylvania Brewing, Pennsylvania
  30. St. Feuillien Cuvee de Noel; Brasserie St. Feuillien, Belgium
  31. Jenlain Noel; Brasserie Duyck, France
  32. Hitachino Nest Commemorative Ale; Kiuchi Brewery, Japan
  33. Doggie Claws; Hair of the Dog Brewing, Oregon
  34. St. Bernardus Christmas Ale; Brouwerij St. Bernardus, Belgium
  35. Heavy Seas Winter Storm; Clipper City Brewery, Maryland
  36. Goose Island Christmas Ale; Goose Island Beer, Illinois
  37. Petrus Winterbeer; Brouwerij Bavik, Belgium
  38. Longfellow Winter Ale; Shipyard Brewing, Maine
  39. Kerst Pater; Brouwerij Van den Bossche, Belgium
  40. Samuel Adams Old Fezziwig; Boston Beer, Massachusetts
  41. Alaskan Winter Ale; Alaskan Brewing, Alaska
  42. Geary’s Winter Ale; D.L. Geary Brewing, Maine
  43. Snow Goose Winter Ale; Wild Goose Brewery, Maryland
  44. Pere Noel; Brouwerij De Ranke, Belgium
  45. Old Man Winter Ale; Southern Tier Brewing, New York
  46. ‘t Smisje Kerst; Brouwerij De Regenboog, Belgium
  47. Young’s Winter Warmer; Wells & Young’s Brewing, England
  48. Snow Cap; Pyramid Breweries, Washington
  49. Nutcracker Ale; Boulevard Brewing, Missouri
  50. Monchshof Weihnachtsbier; Kulmbacher Brauerei, Germany

 
Though I’m not sure where, I would have included Lagunitas’ Brown Shugga, perhaps craft beer’s happiest accident, He’Brew’s Jewbelation, Marin’s Hoppy Holidaze, and Port Brewing’s Santa’s Little Helper. As for what I’d displace to make room for these, well that’s obviously trickier. Though I must confess that I’m not a fan of Anderson Valley’s Winter Solstice. I find the vanilla flavors waaaay to overpowering so that would be the first to go.

 

Excerpted from Don Russell’s wonderful new book, Christmas Beer, the season’s most ideal stocking stuffer. Pick up a copy for every beer lover on your shopping list at Amazon or buy one directly from the author.
 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Holidays

Blue Is the Most Drinkable Color

December 23, 2008 By Jay Brooks

Blue is the most drinkable color. That will be $100,000 for services rendered, thank you very much. Ah, such is the life of a marketeer. Given that life-sustaining water, which accounts for about 60% of our bodies, 70% of our brains and 90% of our lungs, is literally the stuff we’re made of, it’s quite remarkable that you’d need an expert to tell you that anything that associates consumers with water will perceived quite positively, especially if you’re selling a beverage that’s made mostly of water.

But last week, Anheuser-Busch unveiled plans to upgrade their packaging on Bud Light to give it a shot in the arm. I wasn’t going to write about this one. I really wasn’t. All of the big beer companies do this from time to time. They revamp their packaging, releasing press releases that all but tout it as the second coming. It’s frustrating, and doubly so because it usually works. I know good packaging is a must in our consumerist world, and that you must continually tweak it to keep it “fresh” otherwise people stop looking if it’s always the same. But I can’t help by being continually dumbfounded at how absolutely predictable and easily manipulated we all are. Look, shiny object … must touch … must buy. Sheesh, how pathetic. We all pride ourselves on our individuality but at the end of the day we’re more alike than we care to admit, myself included. And boy do marketers have our number. Pick up any recent book on the science of marketing and you’ll be astounded at the level of detail by which marketers can accurately predict our behavior. (For two good places to start, try Paco Underhill’s Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping or Douglas Rushkoff’s Coercion: Why We Listen To What “They” Say.) So, as I said, I was going to leave this latest one go, as I’ve beaten this dead horse time and time again.

What changed my mind was a surprisingly hilarious column in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch by Kevin Horrigan entitled New! Improved! Drinkable!. Given that it was written in St. Louis, it’s delightfully snarky, but perhaps now that the new regime is in perhaps it’s finally possible to criticize the local 100-lb. gorilla and get away with it in a way not possible a month ago. Jeremiah McWilliams, the Post-Dispatch’s usual man on the job when it comes to beer wrote about it earlier, but just related the facts with little commentary or asides.

And naturally, the AP towed the party line as well, with Emily Fredrix’s article passing along such wisdom as these choice nuggets:

The change comes as analysts say more people are buying beer instead of higher-priced wine and spirits.

“As the choices continue to grow for consumers, you also have to tell them what is it about this brand in the bottle,” Keith Levy, vice president of marketing, said recently.

The plastic label on Bud Light’s new bottles is 27 percent larger than the current label and touts “drinkability.” The cans, which are nearly all blue, feature the word “refreshment.”

Levy said the shift to blue came after extensive research showed the color helped drive home the message of refreshment.

And that’s where Horrigan picks up the story, taking the idea of “drinkability” (a 17th century word A-B recently appropriated as its own, it wold be interesting to see how fast the lawsuits fly if someone else tried to use the word now) and his article shows how ridiculous A-B’s marketing department’s use of the word really is. Here’s a sample of what he writes:

Literature fanbase, are you tired of reading ordinary newspaper columns? Why not try our new column, with superior readability?

Ordinary columns go down harsh. Our new column goes down smooth, with no bitter aftertaste. That’s what we call readability, a concept pioneered by our German wordmeisters.

They came to this country with but one thing on their minds: producing a newspaper column that would have superior readability. What’s that mean? Simply put, it means we don’t string words together like the Germans do, like schicklegruberhofmeistergesselschaft (literally, the “guy with the razor who grubs in the barn company”). No, we use short words. English words. Easily digestible words.

Readable words.

As cannily effective as that is, it was this next line that really got me back in the game, writing about this nonsense. After spending millions promoting the concept of “drinkability,” the next phase is to change the color of Bud Light’s packaging: the labels, the cans, the six-pack carriers and the mother cartons, all redone with a “fresh” new color scheme favoring blue. Why blue, you may rightly ask? Here’s how Horrigan puts it. “Because expensive marketing studies indicate that the color blue suggests ‘refreshment.'”

If you’re drinking something, now would be the perfect time to involuntarily spray/spit it out in surprise and horror. Really, people will associate the color of water, which is refreshing, with refreshment? How many advanced degrees, consumer focus groups and surveys and polls with appropriate statistical number crunching do you think led them to make so bold a proclamation as “the color blue suggests refreshment?”

What’s more amazing, is that armed with that insight, they’ve made the decision to make the packaging blue, wth the fir belief that this change will therefore make it sell better, too. If that were really so, wouldn’t every package of any sort of drinkable liquid for sale, alcoholic or not, be blue by now to tap into our subconscious desires for something refreshingly blue? Pepsi is blue. Foster’s is blue. Why aren’t they the number one brands in their categories. Coca-Cola seems to be doing reasonably well with their red packaging. Doesn’t red suggest heat. Why would anyone looking for refreshment choose Coke?

I hope you already know the answers to those questions. Marketing is all about manipulation. It’s the practical application of propaganda for business purposes pioneered during World War I by our government to “persuade” us that going to war was not only a good idea, but necessary for our own safety. Ever since, it’s been the same story before every war our politicians have dragged us into. Hitler was so impressed by how effective our World War I government propaganda was that it inspired him to create an entire department devoted to propaganda headed by Joseph Goebbels after he came to power and created Nazi Germany. It was called The Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda. Isn’t it comforting to know that advertising and marketing has such an impressive heritage and lineage? Modern day P.R. (a phrase coined specifically to avoid the negative connotations that propaganda took on during World War II) and marketing is a direct result of what was learned in the early part of the last century about how to manipulate people in such a way that they would not only do what you wanted, but think it was their idea. If you think that’s no longer going on or that we’re all too smart to fall for such tactics then you’re really not paying attention to the realities of the world. If anything, it has gotten much more sophisticated. Marketing really can make you see white but think its black.

But let’s return to the concept of “drinkability,” a term A-B has toyed with for a number of years before deciding to make it the cornerstone of their latest marketing assault. It’s sure sounds like something you’d want in a drink. But does is have any intrinsic meaning? None whatsoever. It merely means “suitable for drinking,” which fairly defines any liquid that won’t kill you or make you sick if you drink it. It’s hardly some magic idea that any particular drink will have more suitability than another. It’s subterfuge, a gimmick, a deception. But what’s perhaps most chilling about propaganda, is that despite all the science and literature that’s available about it, along with the research and science that forms its basis, it continues to work so effectively. If anything, it works better now than it did a century ago because it is understood today so much more fully and it is generally implemented in such as way that most people have no idea it’s even happening or that they are being manipulated.

Have another look at how the concept of “drinkability” is being sold, as quoted in the AP article:

“Bud Light’s new look will reflect the key attributes of the brand we are touting in all our marketing – drinkability and refreshment,” said Keith Levy, vice president of Marketing, Anheuser-Busch. “Drinkability offers a unique way to express a range of product benefits through a single term. It’s that just right taste – not too heavy or light – that sets Bud Light apart from other light beers.”

Not to put too fine a point on it, but really, nothing sets one light beer apart from any other light beer. That’s what makes them light beers, in a sense. If it weren’t for marketing and advertising, they almost would be interchangeable commodities. I have judged “American-style Light Lagers” at the Great American Beer Festival, and there are precious little differences in the taste of the these beers as made by the large breweries. I’ve been training my palette almost continually for nearly twenty years and it was one of the hardest categories I’ve ever judged, simply because of how alike they were. And it discussing them with my fellow judges, I was not alone in this. It was the general consensus. You end up searching more intensely for any defects, no matter how slight, just as a way to distinguish them from one another. There are slight variations in taste that can be perceived, but they are so superficial that they’re almost meaningless.

That’s where marketing comes in. Millions are spent to convince us that one light beer is different from another. And everybody falls for it, brand loyalty is created and money is made. But blue is also the color of sadness, a cold and lonely blue. That’s how this makes me feel. Blue. Sigh.
 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Cans

Santa Labels

December 20, 2008 By Jay Brooks

I’ve written recently about further efforts by neo-prohibitionist groups to take Santa Claus away from his heritage and out of the hands of adults entirely. As the patron saint of brewers, this effort is naturally misguided, but then so is virtually everything that these chuckleheads undertake. I came across this website from Japan today that collects a number of holiday beer labels from around the world, many of which feature Santa Claus prominently, and several of which I’d not seen before. This nicely illustrates how little issue the rest of the civilized world has with Santa Claus being associated with beer. Below is a sample of the labels.

 

This one’s from the Ukraine.
 

And this one’s from Poland.
 

The X-mas Gueuze is from Belgium.
 

And this last one’s also Polish.

Check out the rest of them.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Holidays

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Find Something

Northern California Breweries

Please consider purchasing my latest book, California Breweries North, available from Amazon, or ask for it at your local bookstore.

Recent Comments

  • Ernie Dewing on Historic Beer Birthday: Charles William Bergner 
  • Steve 'Pudgy' De Rose on Historic Beer Birthday: Jacob Schmidt
  • Jay Brooks on Beer Birthday: Bill Owens
  • Steve 'Pudgy' De Rose on Beer Birthday: Charles Finkel
  • Steve 'Pudgy' De Rose on Beer Birthday: Bill Owens

Recent Posts

  • Historic Beer Birthday: Jacob Knecht January 25, 2026
  • Beer In Ads #5181: Turn Winter Into Spring January 24, 2026
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Philip Bissinger January 24, 2026
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Gottlieb Muhlhauser January 24, 2026
  • Beer Birthday: Ted Vivatson January 24, 2026

BBB Archives

Feedback

Head Quarter
This site is hosted and maintained by H25Q.dev. Any questions or comments for the webmaster can be directed here.