|  T W I T T E R   |  F A C E B O O K Facebook  |  F A N P A G E Facebook Fanpage

Beer's Carbon Footprint

by Jay Brooks on May 26, 2009 · 5 comments

in Uncategorized

There was an odd little tidbit from across the pond, where today a UK government advisor, David Kennedy, chief executive of the Committee on Climate Change, suggested that “people stop consuming lamb and beer to save the planet.” Instead, he recommends chicken or pork, because “they produce fewer carbon emissions.”

A study he did recently found this and other foods’ ratio of carbon emissions per pounds of food produced. It also “revealed that alcoholic drinks contributed significantly to emissions, with the growing and processing of hops and malt into beer and whisky producing 1.5 per cent of Britain’s greenhouse gases.” Curiously, though, England grows very little brewing barley (compared to world production) and its hop acreage is a mere shadow of its former glory, so I’m not entirely sure how this suggestion benefits the UK very much or could possibly be 1.5%.

I guess what I don’t get is why he’s singling out beer for special mention, except that his final quote is revealing. “‘We are not saying that everyone should become vegetarian or give up drinking but moving towards less carbon intensive foods will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve health,’ he said.” Improve health, eh? Except that giving up drinking has been show to be less healthy than moderate drinking, and that moderate drinking has several proven health benefits. So now I have to wonder what his true motives are in picking on beer.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Fark
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Ron Pattinson May 27, 2009 at 4:34 am

“England grows no brewing barley” – what? That’s not true. There’s plenty of malting barley grown in England.

Reply

2 Alan May 27, 2009 at 5:11 am

I’ve been trying to do the math and think that the greenies’ calculations are leaving out barley’s benefits to the carbon cycle.

http://beerblog.genx40.com/archive/2009/may/iknewicouldnt
http://beerblog.genx40.com/archive/2009/may/thatpersnickty

Reply

3 J May 27, 2009 at 8:00 am

Ron, my bad. They’re not one of the top producers like Canada, Australia and central Europe. I honestly thought there wasn’t any, but in retrospect I was forgetting Maris Otter, at the very least. Sorry about that. My only defense is it was very late at night.

Reply

4 Jim May 27, 2009 at 1:59 pm

Just another in a long series of the silliness, stupidity and just plain cussedness of the whole “carbon footprint” malarkey. But this time, it strikes too close to home…I’ll not give up my beer!

Reply

5 michael Reinhardt May 27, 2009 at 2:32 pm

Stop drinking beer. I would maybe rather enjoy a beer while the planet goes into extinction. If it’s any consolation J, Britain’s common drinkers seem to be trending toward less and less flavorful beer…so maybe they won’t be growing barley before long.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: