This will be obvious to anyone who’s ever home brewed, but it’s still nice to see it laid out. Dave Conz, who’s an assistant research professor at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society and the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes (and a lecturer in interdisciplinary studies in the School of Letters and Sciences at Arizona State University) penned an article, What Beer Can Teach Us About Emerging Technologies, where he makes the case that the legalization of homebrewing led to the rise in commercial brewers and breweries, along with a wave of innovation and creativity. Hard to disagree with that. To my mind, homebrewing is easily the ultimate DIY.
- Barley Brothers Brewery
- Barrio Brewing Co.
- Beaver Street Brewing
- Black Mountain Brewing
- Casa Arriba Brewing
- Dave’s Electric Brewpub
- Dragoon Brewing
- Flagstaff Brewing
- Four Peaks Brewing
- Gentle Ben’s Brewing
- Grand Canyon Brewery
- Lumberyard Brewing
- Mogollon Brewing
- Mother Road Brewing Company
- Mudshark Brewing
- Nimbus Brewing
- North Mountain Brewing
- Oak Creek Brewery
- Oak Creek Brewing
- Oggi’s Pizza and Brewing – Phoenix
- Old Bisbee Brewing
- Old World Brewery, Inc.
- Papago Brewing
- Pinnacle Peak
- Prescott Brewing
- SanTan Brewing
- Sleepy Dog Saloon & Brewery
- Sonora Brewhouse
- Sonoran Brewing
- Streets of New York
- SunUp Brewing
- Thunder Canyon Brewery
- Underground Brew Factory
- Wild Weede Brewery
Arizona Brewery Guides
Guild: Arizona Craft Brewers Guild
State Agency: Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
- Capital: Phoenix
- Largest Cities: Phoenix, Tucson, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale
- Population: 5,130,632; 20th
- Area: 114006 sq.mi., 6th
- Nickname: The Grand Canyon State
- Statehood: 48th, February 14, 1912
- Alcohol Legalized: June 16, 1933
- Number of Breweries: 31
- Rank: 20th
- Beer Production: 4,708,088
- Production Rank: 14th
- Beer Per Capita: 22.5 Gallons
- Bottles: 42.8%
- Cans: 47.1%
- Kegs: 9.9%
- Per Gallon: $0.16
- Per Case: $0.36
- Tax Per Barrel (24/12 Case): $4.96
- Draught Tax Per Barrel (in Kegs): $4.96
Economic Impact (2010):
- From Brewing: $114,644,602
- Direct Impact: $968,605,366
- Supplier Impact: $646,575,797
- Induced Economic Impact: $645,915,749
- Total Impact: $2,261,096,912
- Control State: No
- Sale Hours: 6 a.m.–2 a.m. (Mon.-Sun.)
- Grocery Store Sales: Yes
- Notes: Sales of any type of alcohol are legal at any store that has an off-premises liquor license, including but not limited to convenience stores and grocery stores. Bars may sell closed containers of alcohol for consumption off the premises. Drive-through liquor stores are allowed. Everclear Grain Alcohol Proof 190 (95% alcohol) is legal. A large percentage of the land area of Arizona is in Indian reservations, many of which have liquor laws considerably more restrictive than state law, up to and including total prohibition. “Beer busts” (all the beer/liquor one can drink for a set price) in bars are illegal. Persons 19 years of age or older may work in bars and liquor stores serving and selling alcohol. Patrons may not have more than two drinks in front of them at any time, or one large pitcher of beer. DUI penalties are some of the most severe in the nation. A person convicted of a DUI (even first offense) must have an interlock installed in his or her car for one year. Arizona has an ‘Impaired to the Slightest Degree’ law that can convict a person even if his or her BAC is less than .08%.
Data complied, in part, from the Beer Institute’s Brewer’s Almanac 2010, Beer Serves America, the Brewers Association, Wikipedia and my World Factbook. If you see I’m missing a brewery link, please be so kind as to drop me a note or simply comment on this post. Thanks.
For the remaining states, see Brewing Links: United States.
Thanks to Rob Fullmer (a.k.a. olllllo) at Beer PHXation for letting me know about this weirdness. Arizona recently relaxed its 2005 law regarding the sampling of beer, wine and spirits in grocery stores. But one town mayor, John Lewis of Gilbert, Arizona, isn’t happy that someone might be able to have an ounce or two of alcohol, especially if he happens to be in the vicinity of that tasting with his children.
According to the Arizona Republic, he thinks having his kids see people even sipping alcohol will have untold consequences and will undo his careful parenting to, presumably, keep his children from ever seeing demon alcohol anywhere throughout their lives. Here’s how the Gilbert mayor put it:
Lewis recently called on local grocers to “withstand the temptation” to offer free taste-testing of beer, wine and spirits at their stores. He said his family frequently shopped at Sam’s Club, for example, and he would not want his children to be in an atmosphere where alcohol could be sipped.
“For the image and preservation of what has been building Gilbert as a family-centered community, I hope we would not approve the sampling privileges in a family environment,” Lewis said.
I love Fullmer’s response in Beer PHXation:
Apparently Lewis, a grown man, finds the task of teaching his children about the responsible and legal enjoyment of alcohol (or the abstention of it for that matter) in the mere presence of adults tasting 1 or 2 ounces — while still maintaining a code of conduct suitable for the likes of a Sam’s Club — capable of erasing years worth of parental upbringing.
Having a family environment and an educational and informative environment for alcohol use are not mutually exclusive, in fact, the family environment IS the proper environment.
Precisely. What exactly is the problem with seeing adults having a simple taste of alcohol in a responsible, legal environment? This is the sort of modeling behavior we should want our kids to see. Lewis is so far off the deep end that he’s not just upset that his kids might actually see people drinking, he’s even bothered by “an atmosphere where alcohol could be sipped.” [my emphasis.] That means just the thought of there being a place where alcohol “could be sipped,” that there’s a possibility it might happen, is enough to worry him. That he could walk past even an empty roped off area, children in tow, is just too much for him to bear.
Not to get too personal, but according to his bio, he’s been married for 29 years, has 8 kids and 4 grandchildren. The likelihood that he even has impressionable little kids to actually walk through the grocery store with seems somewhat unlikely. So what he’s doing is just political grandstanding.
But his suggestion that somehow sampling alcohol is incompatible with family I find most offensive. I have a family. Countless brewers and beer lovers have families and see no contradiction with the two. That’s because there is no contradiction. Adults can enjoy a drink responsibly without damaging their family. People have being doing so for time immemorial. Why is is that some people believe that there is only one way to parent … their way?
When the bill passed the state legislature, only one representative voted against it, republican Andy Biggs, whose district includes — you guessed it — Gilbert. For him, it was all about the doughnuts, to wit:
“I go in with my kids to go get doughnuts at the Safeway,” Biggs said. “It’s one thing to walk through the liquor department to go to the bakery, but it’s something else when you’ve got people there serving alcoholic beverages.”
Seriously, it’s about his freedom to buy doughnuts without seeing alcohol? What exactly is wrong with these people? Why is it “something else,” whatever that even means, if there is beer sampling? I feel confident he could take another route to reach the bakery. But failing that, if it’s such a big deal couldn’t he just buy his doughnuts somewhere else? Nothing against Safeway, but they’re not exactly the gold standard for pastry.
It just feels like, based on their nonsensical comments, that this is personal for both politicians. And they’re using their positions to force their own issues with alcohol on the rest of the people they represent, in a way that feels out of touch with the average person’s opinion. Obviously, it’s hard to know how any community feels about so complex an issue as alcohol, but I feel confident in saying that a majority of people there do at least drink it.
The original impetus for the bill was to give local alcohol manufacturers a chance to compete locally by allowing Arizona beer and wines to be sampled. As you might expect, Todd Bostock, president of the Arizona Wine Growers Association, believes that “most families wouldn’t be offended by in-store sampling because they already consume alcohol at the dinner table in front of their children. The more kids are exposed to responsible drinking, it won’t be a foreign thing to them,” Bostock said. “It’s not taboo.”
It certainly shouldn’t be, and based on the 54-1 vote it would appear most people agree.
Today’s works of art is quite modern, painted in a style that’s been described as “biomorphic cubism with a touch of surrealism.” The title of the acrylic painting is Cheers, and it was completed last year, in 2009.
The artist, Alex Arshansky, moved with his family from Moscow, Russia to Tucson, Arizona when he was 18. From his Fine Art America biography:
Alexander was born in Moscow and has moved to Arizona (USA) at the age of 18. As the East met West, his work has evolved and become more expressive, depicting symbolic, ambiguous forms and subjects. The critics and art lovers define Alexander’s style as Biomorphic Cubism with elements of surrealism. Great attention is paid to numbers, letters, signs and symbols. Alexander’s works feature vivid, saturated colors – they produce a visual impact even without understanding the content of the painting. Some of his art pieces present a challenging interpretation of religious events and common dogmas to the point of insult.