Well that’s it in a nutshell. Rob, from Pfiff!, explains it more thoroughly, and the real title of his topic for Session #17 is actually “Going Against the Grain Bill: Solstice Edition.” With that mouthful of a title, he’s definitely got some ‘splainin’ to do, which he wittily manages:

Up here in the Northern hemisphere, we’re fast approaching the summer solstice, when the sun opts to beat down on us for as long as possible, and the marketing eye of brewing’s Sauron becomes firmly targeted on light, easily quaffable, lawnmower beers, which we’re all supposed to dumbly chug down after demonstrably wiping our brows with the brim of the sweat-beaded can (cuz it’s hot!) while wearing our mothball-scented aloha shirts and comically over-sized, personalized suede bbq mitts. (I’m likewise certain the same spell is being cast on you all down in the Southern hemisphere, but I can’t even begin to imagine what they’re trying to sell you at the moment.)

Granted, this sounds fun for about a minute. But before too long, we all like to duck out of view and follow our true (beer-related, please) desires, despite how unconventional it may seem to the general populace. Now’s your chance to enlighten the rest of the world on what they might be missing.

The subject for July’s Session could be summed up thusly: Drinking anti-seasonally. Think of this as the unorthodox cousin of such topics as “beer and food” and “beer and music”. Beer and weather, perhaps? More like beer despite the weather, I guess. Cracking open a Guinness on the beach, finishing a day of yardwork with a Speedway Stout, or whatever else you do that raises an eyebrow (again, beer-related, please), do us all a favor an take a few moments to share your non-conformist tale (again, you kangaroos and lemurs down there, your take on this could be even more peculiar, so do chime in, please).

This should be fun. I rarely do what I’m supposed to, so now I’m not sure how to not do something that tells me to talk about what’s something I do that I’m not supposed to. Capisce? Join us on the 4th of July to talk about what beer you drink when no one’s looking.

On the Today Show on NBC this morning, there was a short segment on pairing food with beer and wine, featuring Sam Calagione, from Dogfish Head Brewery, and Marnie Old, his co-author, of the new book by both of them, He Said Beer, She Said Wine. It felt a little rushed, but they did manage to taste the two hosts, Kathie Lee Gifford and Hoda Kotb, on a cheese and some chocolate with both beer and wine. The beer Sam paired with a Gruyere was New Belgium’s Mothership Wit and with the dark chocolate, his own World Wide Stout (aged for five years). This was great exposure for craft beer and food and beer, specifically. The Today Show is about as mainstream as one could ask for.

The Associated Press has an interesting article today that’s been picked up all over the place entitled Politics an Obstacle for InBev’s Anheuser-Busch Bid. The gist of it is that during an election year, patriotism will cause politicians to come down against having ownership of the country’s largest beer company move to foreign shores. To wit:

But politicians and activists are already lining up against the deal, saying it could cost jobs in the United States and send ownership of an iconic American company overseas. With economic concerns at the front of voters’ minds, the opposition could cause a headache for InBev.

Republican Gov. Matt Blunt said Wednesday he opposes the deal, and directed the Missouri Department of Economic Development to see if there was a way to stop it.

“I am strongly opposed to the sale of Anheuser-Busch, and today’s offer to purchase the company is deeply troubling to me,” Blunt said in a statement.

Personally, I haven’t made up my mind yet about the deal and what it will mean for the beer industry, but I have a hard time swallowing the jingoism of these arguments. Where were they when Miller was bought by SAB or when Coors and Molson merged?

The SaveAB website includes some hilarious rhetoric given their cold response to the Latrobe deal. It’s signed “Concerned Americans,” lists a St. Louis address for the organization, and includes the parting shot: “This Bud’s for you and the U.S.A.!” I guess that’s an updated version of the old General Motors saw about “what’s good for GM is good for the country.” Even if the deal does go through, I doubt much will change significantly at the ground level. Bud will likely continue to dominate the market though it’s possible things will change at the upper management level which might eventually signal changes in the company. But there’s still a long way to go before this is finished.

I continue to have very mixed emotions about this deal, but I’m very frustrated by how politicians seem to care only about the largest companies while ignoring the small and regional businesses that fail on a daily basis. Why do we continually help the rich stay rich while ignoring the middle class and poor? I already know the answer to that question, but that doesn’t mean I have to like it. Is it too early to start drinking today?

After literally years of speculation, rumors and blind alleys, it’s official. CNBC is reporting on their “Breaking News” ticker that InBev has made a $65 cash offer for Anheuser-Busch stock. CNBC now has more on the story.

Anheuser-Busch has acknowledged the takeover bid in a press release issued today.

Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. (NYSE: BUD) announced today that it has received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from InBev to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Anheuser-Busch for $65 per share in cash.

Anheuser-Busch said that its board of directors will evaluate the proposal carefully and in the context of all relevant factors, including Anheuser-Busch’s long-term strategic plan. The board will review the merits of the proposal consistent with its fiduciary duties and in consultation with its financial and legal advisers. The board will pursue the course of action that is in the best interests of Anheuser-Busch’s stockholders.

Anheuser-Busch’s board expects to make its determination regarding InBev’s proposal in due course.

I’m sure additional details will emerge in the coming hours and days, though by “due course” it’s more likely going to be months before anything is finalized.
 
UPDATE: Additional reports have put the total price for InBev to acquire A-B at $46.3 billion. The $65 stock offer represents a 24% increase over share value as of May 22, which is the day before the most recent round of takeover rumors began. Despite the seemingly generous offer, some analysts believe it could even go higher, with speculation of a $70 per share final offer fairly common.
 

According to a press release I received today from the National Beer Wholesalers Association, Costco has decided not to seek certiorari to appeal the appellate decision by the Ninth Circuit to the U.S. Supreme Court. This effectively means the matter is over and keeps in place almost all of the state’s regulatory power over alcohol. As almost every other state breathed a heavy sigh of relief, the NBWA “applauded” Costco’s decision, saying it was “a win for the people of Washington state.” From the press release:

[The earlier] Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals [ruling affirmed] the right of states to regulate alcohol consistent with the 21st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Ninth Circuit’s opinion unequivocally upholds Washington’s uniform pricing rule, delivered pricing requirement, volume discount ban, credit prohibition, central warehousing ban, minimum mark-up and retail-to-retail sales ban.

“Alcohol is different from other products available to consumers, and it should be regulated differently,” said NBWA President Craig Purser. “The Ninth Circuit’s ruling upholds the right of states to set alcohol policy. America’s beer distributors will continue to support state-based alcohol regulation that works to keep communities safe.”

Okay, it was just a slip of the tongue, but it was a funny one. On CNN’s Political Ticker blog, they’re reporting that Republican presidential hopeful John McCain accidentally said the following during a speech at the National Small Business Summit held in Washington, DC. “I will use the veto as needed. I will veto every single beer …” before quickly correcting himself. Hilarious. I wonder how his wife felt about that one? Maybe he was just parched and needed a beer. You can even watch a video of McCain’s gaffe.

CNN, through their sister website CareerBuilder.com, ran a fluff piece where they listed their choices for the nine coolest jobs that pay well. Topping the list was “Brewmaster.” I’m not quite convinced about the “pays well” part, but they list the median income as $42,430, based on data from CBSalary.com. They justified their choice with this questionable bit of logic:

To put it mildly, a lot of people like to drink beer. It’s associated with goods times, 21st birthdays and football games. (In fairness, it’s also associated with hangovers the next day.) Who wouldn’t want to be the creator of a tasty ale that will be imbibed by many the partygoer? Plus, you get to do taste-testing along the way, which is always fun.

Brewmaster beat out toy creator, doll fashion designer and even sommelier. I’m glad to see it top the list, and I’m certainly not arguing it doesn’t deserve to be there, I just think brewers deserve to be paid better. Now that would be cool.

I got a couple of e-mails today that Jay Misson, the head brewer for Triumph Brewing in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, passed away today. He worked for Gordon Biersch for a time, training brewpub brewers, and I think I met him once during that period in his career. Lew Bryson, who knew him quite well, has a moving piece on his blog today.