Brookston Beer Bulletin

Jay R. Brooks on Beer

  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial
  • Birthdays
  • Art & Beer

Socialize

  • Dribbble
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Powered by Genesis

Patent No. WO2001040514A1: Method Of Judging Flocculating Properties Of Bottom Brewer’s Yeast

June 7, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 2001, US Patent WO 2001040514 A1 was issued, an invention of Makiko Jibiki, assigned to Asahi Breweries, Ltd., for his “Method of Judging Flocculating Properties of Bottom Brewer’s Yeast.” Here’s the Abstract:

A method of easily evaluating the flocculating properties of bottom brewer’s yeast within a short period of time at a high reproducibility without carrying out fermentation. This method is characterized by using the ORF sequence of a flocculation gene FLO5 of a laboratory yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

2001040514-0.jpg
2001040514-1.jpg

Filed Under: Beers, Breweries, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Law, Patent, Yeast

Patent Nos. 3323919A & 3323920A: Preparation Of Concentrated Fermented Malt Beverage Of Low Hop Content & Concentration Of Beer By Crystallization And Distillation

June 6, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1967, US Patent 3323919 A and US Patent 3323920 A was issued, both an invention of Emil A Malick, assigned to the Phillips Petroleum Co., for his “Preparation Of Concentrated Fermented Malt Beverage of Low Hop Content” and “Concentration of Beer By Crystallization and Distillation.” There’s no Abstract, though it’s described this way in the applications:

This invention relates to a process for the preparation of a novel fermented malt beverage. In another aspect, it relates to the fermented malt beverage so produced as a new composition of matter.

The concentration of aqueous solutions, such as fruit juices, wines and beer, by crystallization to remove water therefrom and produce a concentrate which is reconstituted by dilution thereof with water, is receiving increasing attention in the food processing and allied industries. In the case of beer, it has been shown that significant savings in brewing, storage, and shipping can be gained by the freeze concentration of beer and its reconstitution; that the taste, aroma, and keeping qualities of the reconstituted beer are as good as, and in some cases better than, the beer produced by the present standard brewing process; and that the useful storage or shelf life of the beer, whether stored in a concentrated or reconstituted state, is greatly increased.

In the freeze concentration of beer, especially by the process known in the brewing industry as the Phillips Fractional Crystallization Process and basically covered by US. Reissue Patent 23,810 to J. Schmidt and US. Patent 2,854,494 to R. W. Thomas, the concentrate which is produced from beer made by the standard brewing process generally will have an unacceptable harsh, bitter taste which is generally unpalatable to the layman as well as brewmasters and beer connoisseurs, though when reconstituted such concentrate yields an excellent beverage.

Accordingly, an object of this invention is to provide a process for preparing a novel fermented malt beverage. Another object is to provide such a malt beverage as a new composition of matter. Further objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description and accompanying drawing in which the single figure schematically illustrates an embodiment of fractional crystallization apparatus which can be used in preparing the novel malt beverage of this invention.

I have now discovered that a novel concentrate of beer, which is itself an appealing, palatable malt beverage having excellent taste and aroma, can be made by freeze concentration of beer brewed from wort hopped with an amount of hops that is inversely proportional to the amount of water removed from the beer by said freeze concentration, said amount of hops being substantially below that used in the standard beer brewing process. For example, where 75 percent of the water is removed from the beer by freeze concentration thereof, the amount of hops added to the Wort and boiled therewith will be, according to this invention, about one-fourth the amount generally used in making a conventional beer, or a reconstituted beer from a beer concentrate. In other respects, the beer from which the novel beverage or concentrate of this invention is obtained can be made or brewed by the standard brewing process, such as that used in making the American type of Pilsener beer. Preferably, in addition to employing the reduced amount of hops, as described above, any conventional additives normally used in brewing which will, upon freeze concentration of the beer, attain an undesirably high level in the concentrate such as to degrade the taste and other desirable properties thereof, are also reduced in the amount conventionally employed.

The amount of water which is removed from the low-hops beer by freeze concentration thereof, according to this invention, can vary and generally will be in the range of 25 to 85 weight percent, preferably to weight percent. Correspondingly, the inversely proportional amount of hops to be used in making the beer to be freeze concentrated will generally be about 5 to 20 pounds per barrels of brew, preferably about 10 to 16 pounds per 100 barrels of brew.

The wort, from which the novel beverage of this invention is made, can be conventionally prepared by mashing barley malt with water, for example at 67 to 70 C., and, if desired, suitable precooked adjuncts, such as unmalted barley, corn grits or flakes, rice, and like cereal and starchy products, the malt usually making up from 50 to 75 percent of the total brewing materials. The temperature is thereafter raised, for example to 75 C., to inactivate the enzymes. Undissolved grain and husks are removed from the mash generally in so-called lauter tubs or mash filters. The resulting soluble or sweet wort is then hopped in a brewing kettle, using the small quantity of hops mentioned above. If desired, the hops used can be made up of 25 to 30% imported or choice Fuggles and 70 to 75% domestic hops. Following hopping, or boiling of the hopped wort, brewing can be completed according to the standard brewing process using the usual standard brewing procedures, equipment and materials, all of which are of general knowledge and are substantially the same throughout the industry in the United States. For example, the hopped wort (or brew) is strained, cooled, and subjected to bottom fermentation by the addition of a yeast, e.g., one pound of liquid yeast per barrel of brew. After fermentation is completed, the yeast is removed and the young beer or ruh is clarified, aged, pasteurized, stored, filtered, chill-proofed, carbonated, finished, and filtered. Alternatively, any one or all of these latter operations can be eliminated and it is within the scope of this invention to prepare the novel beverage of this invention by freeze concentrating the beer, with or without first filtering it, as it leaves the fermenters, or as it leaves the clarifying tanks or cellar, or after it leaves the lagering cellar. Such alternatives can be used because during freeze concentration suspended solids such as yeast and hop resins will be removed along with the ice. Because of the low temperatures of the free concentration step, e.g., 25 to 32 F., the solubilities of undesirable materials such as those which normally give rise to haze and sediment (which materials are normally removed by clarification and on storage or lagering) are decreased and they precipitate and can be removed with the ice. Also, since the freeze concentration is carried out at low temperatures, and the alcoholic content is increased, bacterial activity and undesirable changes due to the activity of residual yeast cells or spores are decreased or stopped, and pasteurization can be eliminated without impairing the desirable shelf life and keeping qualities of the novel concentrate.

The ethyl alcohol content is increased by the freeze concentration, for example a low-hops beer with 3 to 8 volume percent alcohol can be concentrated to increase the alcohol content to 5 to 25 volume percent, preferably 7 to 18 volume per-cent. The alcoholic content of the concentrate will vary with the alcoholic content of the beer which is concentrated and the number of concentration stages used. As compared with a concentrate prepared by freeze concentration of a standard beer made with about four times as much hops, the concentrate of this invention has about one-half or less the amount of furfuryl alcohol content, e.g., the concentrate of this invention has less than 0.3 Weight percent furfuryl alcohol, and can have as low as 0.002 weight percent furfuryl alcohol.

The freeze concentration step can be carried out batchwise, for example using a plurality of alternate ice-generators and centrifuges connected in series, or, preferably, by continuously cooling the beer to produce a slurry of ice crystals and mother liquor, melting the crystals, passing at least a portion of the melt in contact with and countercurrent to the crystals, and separating the mother liquor (or beer concentrate) and the melted ice, such continuous process being preferably carried out in a plurality of stages, e.g. three. If desired, the concentrate which is produced by the freeze concentration step can be filtered to remove any precipitated materials not removed with the melted ice. Suitable apparatus for carrying out the freeze concentration of the low-hops beer by a continuous process is that shown in said patents to Schmidt and Thomas. Schmidts process involves moving a mixture of crystals and adhering liquid through a liquid removal zone, a reflux zone and a melting zone, removing liquid in said liquid removal zone, melting crystals in said melting zone, withdrawing part of the melt from the melting zone and forcing another part of the melt in a direction countercurrent to the movement of crystals in said reflux zone. In Thomas process (which is an improvement over the separation of the type disclosed by Schmidt), the solids in the purification zone are counter-currently contacted with a pulsating flow of reflux liquid by application against the melt of pulsating pressure generated by a pulse pump, the pulsation of the reflux liquid occurring during sustained application of force to the crystals to feed the same into the liquid removal zone.

The alcoholic malt beverage or elixir prepared according to this invention differs from beer in taste and is whol ly unlike any drink hereto produced, although it has a basic beer-like flavor. Unlike reconstituted beer of concentrates made from beer brewed with the regular amount of hops, reconstituted beer of the novel concentrates of this invention has a terrible taste. Like beer, the malt beverage of this invention willhave varying amounts of unfermented sugars and dextrins, proteinlike substances, flavoring constituents derived from malt and yeast, and minor constituents such as various inorganic salts, metabolic by-products of yeast, vitamins, traces of iron and copper, etc. The beverage of this invention will usually have some residual carbonation and, if desired, it can be further carbonated to -O.4O.6 weight percent carbon dioxide.

US3323919-0

This invention relates to a method for concentrating aqueous solutions by crystallization and distillation. In another aspect, it relates to a method for the preparation of an alcoholic beverage.

Near-beer is conventionally prepared by first making a regular beer and then removing a portion of the alcohol by distillation. It is generally accepted that these near beers do not have the quality of the regular beer, probably because the distillation of the regular beer results in the degradation and/or removal of some of the flavor and odor components.

Although this discussion will be simplified by primary reference to the preparation of near-beer, it is obvious that the invention is also applicable to any process for the removal of a volatile component more volatile than water from a multi-component aqueous liquid. Thus, the invention is also applicable to the preparation of near wine of low alcohol content as well as other alcoholic beverages where it is necessary to reduce the alcohol content.

US3323920-0

Filed Under: Beers, Breweries, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Law, Non-Alcoholic, Patent, Science of Brewing

Patent No. 4836097A: Whirlpool For Coarse Sludge Separation In Brewing Of Beer

June 6, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1989, US Patent 4836097 A was issued, an invention of Hans Tretter, assigned to Anton Steinecker Maschinenfabrik Gmbh, for his “Whirlpool for Coarse Sludge Separation in Brewing Of Beer.” Here’s the Abstract:

The present invention refers to a whirlpool for coarse sludge separation from the wort in brewing of beer, said whirlpool being being constructed as a circular receptacle provided with a base on which the sludge deposits and with a heating means for heating the wort.

For providing a possibility of treating the wort in a space-saving manner and without any special insulating measures in the wort heating process, the invention is characterized by the features that a rotationally symmetrical inner boiler is provided as a heating means, said inner boiler being arranged in the interior of the receptacle such that it is concentric with the longitudinal center axis of the receptacle and such that its lower side extends in spaced relationship with the base of the receptacle.

US4836097-1

Filed Under: Beers, Breweries, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: Brewing Equipment, History, Law, Patent, Science of Brewing

Patent No. 279019A: Beer Chip

June 5, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1883, US Patent 279019 A was issued, an invention of Bernard Rice, for his “Beer Chip.” There’s no Abstract, though it’s described this way in the application:

This invention relates to that class of beer chips in which groves or indentations are made upon the surface surfaces of the chips for the purposes of increasing their superficies. Prior to my invention such grooves have been impressed upon the surfaces of the chips, as by calendering-rolls; but such method of producing the grooves is objectionable,because when the chips are applied to repeated use the grooves are obliterated by the natural expansion of the wood when exposed to the beer, and hence it is necessary to re-indent the chips after each use in order to preserve the desired condition thereof.

My invention is designed to overcome such objection; and to this end it consists in a chip having portions of the wood removed in proper lines across the grain to produce the desired grooves or indentations, as hereinafter more fully described.

This is almost exactly the same as a previous application and patent grant from Rice a year earlier, with Patent No. 257977A.

US279019-0

Filed Under: Beers, Breweries, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Law, Patent, Science of Brewing

Patent No. 856140A: Triple Pipe Beer Cooler

June 4, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1907, US Patent 856140 A was issued, an invention of Joseph Berkowitz and William Lapin, for their “Triple Pipe Beer Cooler.” There’s no Abstract, though it’s described this way in the application:

This invention relates to triple pipe beer coolers adapted to permit a continuous circulation in separate pipes, respectively, of beer, brine and ammonia, the various pipes being arranged and connected at their ends to form a continuous coil, having an inlet at one end and an outlet at the other.

The invention relates more particularly to an improvement in the construction of the heads or bends connecting in alternate relation the opposite ends of the pipes of the coil.

US856140-0
US856140-1
US856140-2

Filed Under: Beers, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Kegs, Law, Patent

Patent No. 2598751A: Art Of Cooling And Dispensing Beverages

June 3, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1952, US Patent 2598751 A was issued, an invention of Joseph Berkowitz and William Lapin, for their “Art of Cooling and Dispensing Beverages.” There’s no Abstract, though it’s described this way in the application:

The apparatus of the invention in its essential details consists of a hermetically sealed tank, a liquid line from a compressor-condensing unit connected to said tank, an expansion valve near the juncture of said liquid line and tank, a hermetically sealed conduit also connected to said tank, a suction or return line from said conduit to said compressor-condensing unit, a beverage line encased by said conduit and extending into said tank, the free end of said beverage line extending through a wail of said tank, and being provided with a dispensing tap. The tank is preferably encased in a dispensing unit or cabinet of desired construction and design, and the source of beverage, e. g. barrels or kegs, may advantageously be housed in a storage chamber of the walk-in type, which is preferably cooled as by means of a diffuser or other refrigerating device.

US2598751-0
US2598751-1

Filed Under: Beers, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Kegs, Law, Patent

Patent No. 4670274A: Process For Controlling The Germination Of Malting Barley

June 2, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1987, US Patent 4670274 A was issued, an invention of Piroska Ress, Istvan Kiss, Geza Miltenyi, Antal Strahl, Imre Petro, Jozsef Farkas, Peter Biacs, Istvanne Kozma, and Istvan Debreczeny, assigned to Kobanyai Sorgyar, for their “Process For Controlling the Germination of Malting Barley.” Here’s the Abstract:

The present invention relates to controlling germination of barley in the malting process. More particularly, the invention relates to the treatment of malting barley by ionizing radiation prior to the malting process.

Untitled
Barley field in Colorado.

Filed Under: Beers, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: barley, History, Law, Malt, Patent

Patent No. 228292A: Vent For Beer-Barrels

June 1, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 1880, US Patent 228292 A was issued, an invention of Otto Zwietusch, for his “Vent for Beer-Barrels.” There’s no Abstract, though it’s described this way in the application:

My invention relates to Vents for beer-barrels; and it consists in the device hereinafter described.

The drawing is a vertical section through the center of my device.

The bottle or bulb A may be of ordinary Construction, screw-threaded at its top to receive a rim, B, having an annular flange, the purpose of which is to clamp the cover O in place. A Washer is generally interposed between the bottle and cover, which latter is provided with an outlet-tube, D upon which l place the flexible pipe Gr, that leads into the beer-keg,and an outlet tube E, which extends down into bulb or bottle A, partly filled with water, and is provided with a flexible valve E,

which, while it will permit air to pass through from Without will be collapsed by greater pressure from within. So, therefore, when beer is being draw from the keg, the air rushes in from the outside to take its place; but as soon as the outflow from the keg ceases the valve E closes and prevents the exit of any of the gases which give life to the beer.

US228292-0

Filed Under: Beers, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Kegs, Law, Patent

The Downside To Working Long Hours

May 31, 2016 By Jay Brooks

workers
A few months ago, Anheuser-Busch InBev head honcho Carlos Brito was quoted as saying that “every employee should behave like an owner-entrepreneur, committed to building the company.” That bullshit mantra favored by corporate leaders, known as “DWYL” (do what you love), is just another way to exploit workers, in the same way “monarchs used to tell about being ordained by God help us get through the day not by easing our pain, but by increasing our capacity for suffering.” As I noted at the time, I hate that way of thinking, and it completely pisses me off that they think anyone should fall for it. AlterNet had an interesting pice at the time that refuted that way of thinking, called Don’t Feel Like a Failure for Not Loving Your Corporate Job Enough.

Curiously, though not exactly a surprise, a recent meta-study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) entitled “Long working hours and alcohol use: systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies and unpublished individual participant data,” found that the more you work, the more at risk you are to drink too much. Anybody shocked to hear that? The study looked at 63 different studies, and in the aggregate reached the same conclusion. Too much work will drive you to drink. Here’s the abstract:

Objective To quantify the association between long working hours and alcohol use.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies and unpublished individual participant data.

Data sources A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases in April 2014 for published studies, supplemented with manual searches. Unpublished individual participant data were obtained from 27 additional studies.

Review methods The search strategy was designed to retrieve cross sectional and prospective studies of the association between long working hours and alcohol use. Summary estimates were obtained with random effects meta-analysis. Sources of heterogeneity were examined with meta-regression.

Results Cross sectional analysis was based on 61 studies representing 333 693 participants from 14 countries. Prospective analysis was based on 20 studies representing 100 602 participants from nine countries. The pooled maximum adjusted odds ratio for the association between long working hours and alcohol use was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.18) in the cross sectional analysis of published and unpublished data. Odds ratio of new onset risky alcohol use was 1.12 (1.04 to 1.20) in the analysis of prospective published and unpublished data. In the 18 studies with individual participant data it was possible to assess the European Union Working Time Directive, which recommends an upper limit of 48 hours a week. Odds ratios of new onset risky alcohol use for those working 49-54 hours and ≥55 hours a week were 1.13 (1.02 to 1.26; adjusted difference in incidence 0.8 percentage points) and 1.12 (1.01 to 1.25; adjusted difference in incidence 0.7 percentage points), respectively, compared with working standard 35-40 hours (incidence of new onset risky alcohol use 6.2%). There was no difference in these associations between men and women or by age or socioeconomic groups, geographical regions, sample type (population based v occupational cohort), prevalence of risky alcohol use in the cohort, or sample attrition rate.

Conclusions Individuals whose working hours exceed standard recommendations are more likely to increase their alcohol use to levels that pose a health risk.

working-hard

Unusually, the entire study is available online if you want to read the entire study, their methodology, the data sets and their analysis. But you probably don’t need to in order to come to the same conclusion. Being worked too hard by companies trying to squeeze every ounce of labor out of their salaried and even hourly employees is not good for them. People need to balance their work life with the rest of their lives. It may be a cliche that nobody every says on their death bed that they wished they’d spent more time at work, but that doesn’t make it any less true. As the class divide continues to widen, people are feeling increasing pressure to work longer hours just to keep their jobs, and employers are exploiting, encouraging and even requiring such behavior. In my own experience, my last corporate job required 60-hour work weeks, and I had to work from home a few hours every single Sunday, vacation, sick day, holiday or not. One of my biggest regrets was after having taken a week off to fly back to Pennsylvania to be with by father on his deathbed, he begged me to stay a few more days. The pressure to return to work was so great that I felt that I could not, and reluctantly I flew back to California. He died in his sleep while my plane was still in the air flying home to San Francisco. Our society is unhealthy when we’re expected to put our companies — which in reality care almost nothing for our loyalty and hard work, and would fire each and every one of us in an instant if it helped the share price or the bottom line — ahead of our personal lives. The more that becomes normalized, the worse off we’ll be as a nation. Working too long and/or too hard is not good for people.

496800929

Filed Under: Beers, Editorial, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: Business, Statistics

Patent No. 20130133340A1: Keg Apparatus For Self Cooling And Self Dispensing Liquids

May 30, 2016 By Jay Brooks

patent-logo
Today in 2013, US Patent 20130133340 A1 was issued, an invention of Mark Sillince and David Cull, assigned to the Joseph Company International, Inc., for their “Keg Apparatus for Self Cooling and Self Dispensing Liquids.” Here’s the Abstract:

A self-cooling and self dispensing beverage container in the form of a keg which includes a heat exchange unit having a plurality of segments of compressed carbon disposed therein. A valve is secured to a tube attached to the REU housing for carbon dioxide to adsorbed and then desorbed by the carbon for cooling the beverage. A dispense gas canister is disposed within the container to automatically release carbon dioxide to maintain a pressure head within the container sufficient to assure dispensing of the beverage.

US20130133340A1-20130530-D00001
US20130133340A1-20130530-D00002
US20130133340A1-20130530-D00003
US20130133340A1-20130530-D00008

Filed Under: Beers, Just For Fun, Politics & Law, Related Pleasures Tagged With: History, Kegs, Law, Patent

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Find Something

Northern California Breweries

Please consider purchasing my latest book, California Breweries North, available from Amazon, or ask for it at your local bookstore.

Recent Comments

  • Bob Paolino on Beer Birthday: Grant Johnston
  • Gambrinus on Historic Beer Birthday: A.J. Houghton
  • Ernie Dewing on Historic Beer Birthday: Charles William Bergner 
  • Steve 'Pudgy' De Rose on Historic Beer Birthday: Jacob Schmidt
  • Jay Brooks on Beer Birthday: Bill Owens

Recent Posts

  • Beer In Ads #5186: Today’s The Day! March 26, 2026
  • Historic Beer Birthday: Bill Brand March 26, 2026
  • Historic Beer Bornday: Fraggle March 26, 2026
  • Beer In Ads #5185: Too Good To Last March 25, 2026
  • Beer In Ads #5184: It’s Here! March 25, 2026

BBB Archives

Feedback

Head Quarter
This site is hosted and maintained by H25Q.dev. Any questions or comments for the webmaster can be directed here.